If you are a frequent visitor to my blog, you may have wondered at some point what my position is on the current war in the Middle East. Like I've said many times before, I do not identify with either major political party, and on this issue I stand firmly behind that principle, as I see both sides throwing stones at the war issue while nothing gets done. Most Republicans simply label anyone against the war as a "commie", "socialist", or the like, while many Democrats want our troops out of there immediately with no further effort.
I wouldn't be writing on this topic at all if it weren't for this weekend's massive Wikileaks release to The New York Times, The Guardian, and Der Spiegel containing about 90,000 reports on activity in Afghanistan, many filed by the military, from 2004 to January 2010. I'm no stranger to Wikileaks, I "StumbledUpon" it a while ago and thought it quite interesting that such a forum existed to oust government cover-ups from the trivial to the outrageous. While I don't regularly keep up with the site, I nevertheless applaud Julian Assange for releasing these reports, regardless of their actual accuracy, and I'll tell you why.
The jist of the leak is that things in Afghanistan are not going exactly as planned. Until now, the American press has been given limited information as to what is happening over there, in regards to civilian death toll, details of insurgent attacks, progress of the Afghan society, etc. If our ridiculous media sphere doesn't know the facts, why trust them? I'll take previously covered-up information over television garbage any day of the week. The most interesting pieces of news are the ones mommy and daddy are hiding from us (aka the government). Yesterday's and today's leak-driven news reports make many interesting claims:
- Many of our more recent military tactics revolve around minerals, surprisingly not oil!
- The general population thinks their new government is worse than the Taliban.
- Insurgents have shown up to battle wearing government-issued uniforms and driving government-issued Ford Rangers, both of which the United States provided to them.
- Pakistan law currently allows secret service members to hold strategy meetings with the Taliban in order to discuss plans for taking down the American occupation in Afghanistan, including assassinations of Afghan government officials.
- Goodwill missions are often abandoned after only a few months, including an orphanage founded in 2006 which after a few months reported housing only 30 orphans when there were supposed to be over 100, and after only a year of the orphanage being established, reported housing no orphans at all.
- According to Assange, actual civilian casualties at Afghan roadblocks, airstrikes, etc. "numerically eclipse" the death tolls of bigger events we hear about on the news.
Military spending currently makes up over 50% of our federal discretionary spending. That's about a trillion dollars a year. Something tells me that's more than enough money to create tactical strategies that actually target terrorist groups from the inside out, but instead our plan is to...well, I don't know, let the insurgents come to us first and blow up our troops? Build fake orphanages to act like we're doing some good for their society? It's disparaging to our honorable armed forces, and to our national identity, to draw this out much longer. The Wikileaks crowd got it right; they exposed the disorganization surrounding this war, and silently posed this rhetorical question: What's the plan?
Time to actually start picking off the real terrorists, methinks. They have the money and the capabilities to do so.